It ’s an optical trick that we are all probably familiar with . When you search at the simulacrum , do you see a duck or a coney ?

As shortly as someone says one or the other , your brain tend to flip it so you see whichever creature they have just said . Curiously , though , when the same image is displayed side by side , it is very hard for our brainiac to see both a duck and a rabbit at the same clip .

Yet as shortly as someone suggests “ reckon a duck eating a rabbit”,something fall out . When move , your brain can suddenly picture both the duck’s egg and the coney together , whereas before it could n’t .

“ Your brain sort of rapid growth out and can see the heavy motion picture when the images are put into circumstance with one another , ” explain Kyle Mathewson , author of the study published in the journalPerception , in astatement .

Another interesting point with the research is the wording that is used to move participant to view the images in a sure way .

Mathewson   tried different idiom to see if it would have an impact on whether or not people are able-bodied to see both the coney and the duck’s egg at the same fourth dimension . But while saying “ duck’s egg eats coney ” was successful in being able-bodied to do this , a simpler and less vivid phrase such as “ imagine a duck beside a coney ” did not .

The researcher think that the simpler , more neutral wording was ineffectual to help the participants see both animals at the same time because there is no clue as to which image should be the duck’s egg and which should be the rabbit . The brain needs a prompting to disambiguate the scene , to know which is which .

While this might seem fairly remove and unrelated to our day to solar day lives , the psychology behind it has some fascinating implications for us .

“ This study also show that we can curb the mental capacity ’s direction of interpret information with just a few words or with an image , ” Mathewsoncontinues . “ We should all be aware of that when , for example , we ’re register a news story . We ’re often interpreting and see information the manner we want to see it . ”

And in a world in which information and news is gyrate and spread more rapidly than ever before , keeping this in mind could not be more prescient .